tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6457473.post5012538773113685689..comments2023-05-27T10:29:17.441+01:00Comments on Little's Log: Who should be more worried?Antonyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09165606568016036829noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6457473.post-39678201320699853632011-02-05T09:21:23.349+00:002011-02-05T09:21:23.349+00:00How about the issue of public accountability? Do ...How about the issue of public accountability? Do you believe that clear safeguards will not be overridden in the pursuit of profit?Bob3noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6457473.post-73026859464568328102011-02-04T20:44:33.623+00:002011-02-04T20:44:33.623+00:00Not partisan and not an attack and certainly no as...Not partisan and not an attack and certainly no assumption you are Labour Bob; re-read what I said. If those facts are true (which I understand them to be) and there are clear safeguards (e.g. access) then I don't see why privately managed forests should be any worse than publicly managed ones?Antonyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09165606568016036829noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6457473.post-54205151496366846782011-02-04T09:12:25.243+00:002011-02-04T09:12:25.243+00:00It's interesting you started with a partisan a...It's interesting you started with a partisan attack on Labour without really addressing the real concern here Antony.<br />You automatically assume I am a Labour party supporter, which I'm not.<br /><br />Just because its 85% of current square footage it doesn't mean we should not retain some in public ownership. <br />It's like saying we should sell all the council houses off, because most of our property is privately owned.<br /><br />I do believe it is privatising our access to trees, and that in itself goes against the principle of free access.<br /><br />It's wrong, and I am angry we are even considering further selling off.Bob3noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6457473.post-53355031503997367022011-02-03T18:36:43.893+00:002011-02-03T18:36:43.893+00:00Is it really "privatising" trees? Aren&...Is it really "privatising" trees? Aren't 85% of the current square footage of forests currently in private ownership? Didn't the last Labour government start this process? If I know that info I can make up my mind. Any idea Bob?Antonyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09165606568016036829noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6457473.post-21689399407252543862011-02-02T08:39:10.016+00:002011-02-02T08:39:10.016+00:00Do you think we should privatise our trees?Do you think we should privatise our trees?Bob3noreply@blogger.com